PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRDBX vs. DWTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
1.84%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.22%28.08%24.03%
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
1.28%27.93%12.86%-0.79%2.23%12.69%18.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRDBX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than DWTFX's 1.28% return.


CRDBX

1D
4.87%
1M
4.80%
YTD
1.84%
6M
8.34%
1Y
36.76%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*

DWTFX

1D
3.54%
1M
-8.70%
YTD
1.28%
6M
10.35%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRDBX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than DWTFX's 1.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CRDBX vs. DWTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DWTFX
DWTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DWTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DWTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRDBXDWTFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

1.35

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

1.71

+1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.30

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

1.78

+3.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.62

6.55

+10.07

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRDBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the DWTFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRDBX and DWTFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRDBXDWTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.35

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.62

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.33

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CRDBX and DWTFX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Dividend Comparison

CRDBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.08%, more than DWTFX's 10.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
15.08%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
10.47%10.60%0.00%1.33%7.27%22.92%7.11%7.00%3.78%9.52%3.06%6.27%

Drawdowns

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRDBX drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than DWTFX's maximum drawdown of -46.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRDBX and DWTFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRDBXDWTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.00%

-46.24%

-50.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-16.49%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.00%

-19.87%

-77.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.71%

-13.53%

-82.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-9.14%

-16.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

4.49%

-2.27%

Volatility

CRDBX vs. DWTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) is 5.18%, while Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that CRDBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRDBXDWTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

7.62%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

17.94%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.01%

21.31%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,635.86%

15.80%

+1,620.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,525.82%

16.30%

+1,509.52%