CRCO vs. YMAG
CRCO (YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRCO charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
CRCO vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCO achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's -0.53% return.
CRCO
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 14.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $554.17K | $590.63K | $1.39M | |
| $11.56M | $13.03M | $15.27M |
CRCO vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCO YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | -13.94% | -38.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | -0.53% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCO and YMAG is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCO vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
CRCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YMAG
CRCO vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF (CRCO) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCO vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCO drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCO and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.75% | -25.96% | -35.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.61% | -6.76% | -44.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.79% | -4.68% | -31.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.03% | — |
Volatility
CRCO vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCO | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.90% | 18.35% | +65.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.90% | 21.16% | +62.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.90% | 21.16% | +62.74% |
CRCO vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCO vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
CRCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 158.06%, more than YMAG's 51.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRCO YieldMax CRCL Option Income Strategy ETF | 158.06% | 35.79% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 51.93% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCO and YMAG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRCO is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRCO is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
CRCO has the higher dividend yield at 158.06%, compared with 51.93% for YMAG.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for CRCO and 1.28% for YMAG.
Find the right allocation for CRCO and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer