PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCG vs. NBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCG achieves a -23.15% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.


CRCG

1D
0.50%
1M
-42.78%
YTD
-23.15%
6M
-39.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIG

1D
6.23%
1M
96.57%
YTD
487.61%
6M
268.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRCG and NBIG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF (CRCG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRCG vs. NBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRCGNBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

1.38

-1.85

Drawdowns

CRCG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCG drawdown since its inception was -93.85%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCG and NBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCGNBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.85%

-75.83%

-18.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.35%

-3.94%

-83.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.46%

-42.82%

-26.64%

Volatility

CRCG vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCGNBIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

197.90%

200.64%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

197.90%

200.64%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

197.90%

200.64%

-2.74%

CRCG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRCG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRCG nor NBIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRCG and NBIG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CRCG.

CRCG and NBIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CRCG and 0.75% for NBIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCG and NBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer