CRCD vs. RBLU
CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while RBLU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX). CRCD is actively managed, while RBLU is passively managed. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for RBLU.
Performance
CRCD vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -83.29% return, which is significantly lower than RBLU's -75.60% return.
CRCD
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- 6M
- -85.88%
- YTD
- -83.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RBLU
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- 6M
- -67.81%
- YTD
- -75.60%
- 1Y
- -91.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -57.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.54M | $9.75M | $17.00M | |
| $512.92K | $1.22M | $2.91M |
CRCD vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -83.29% | 38.83% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | -75.60% | -67.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCD and RBLU is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCD vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBLU
CRCD vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCD | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.80 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCD vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, roughly equal to the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and RBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCD | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.95% | -94.76% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.08% | -93.19% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.23% | -47.99% | -13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 71.16% | — |
Volatility
CRCD vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCD | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 40.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 103.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.82% | 127.43% | +72.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.82% | 119.68% | +80.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.82% | 119.68% | +80.14% |
CRCD vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RBLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCD vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison
CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | 5.31% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCD and RBLU have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBLU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBLU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while RBLU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 1.05% for RBLU.
Find the right allocation for CRCD and RBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer