CRCD vs. QCJL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and QCJL (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while QCJL is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QCJL.

Performance

CRCD vs. QCJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -79.80% return, which is significantly lower than QCJL's 5.95% return.

CRCD

• 1D: 14.90%
• 1M: 41.63%
• 6M: -80.01%
• YTD: -79.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QCJL

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 5.48%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 1Y: 11.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCD vs. QCJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	-79.80%	38.83%
QCJL FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July	5.95%	2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCD and QCJL is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

CRCD vs. QCJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QCJL

QCJL Risk / Return Rank: 81
QCJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QCJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QCJL Omega Ratio Rank: 86
QCJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QCJL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCD vs. QCJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - July (QCJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRCD	QCJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.06	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.99	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.85	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.55	—

Drawdowns

CRCD vs. QCJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than QCJL's maximum drawdown of -11.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and QCJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRCD	QCJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.95%	-11.18%	-85.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.42%	0.00%	-90.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.01%	-1.01%	-59.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.78%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRCD	QCJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	200.70%	5.54%	+195.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	200.70%	9.20%	+191.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	200.70%	9.20%	+191.50%

CRCD vs. QCJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QCJL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRCD vs. QCJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRCD nor QCJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRCD and QCJL in my portfolio?

CRCD and QCJL have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRCD or QCJL?

On fees, QCJL is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRCD or QCJL?

QCJL is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRCD or QCJL?

CRCD and QCJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRCD and QCJL?

CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QCJL is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 0.90% for QCJL.