PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCD vs. EOSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRCD vs. EOSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRCD

1D
4.36%
1M
3.99%
6M
-85.88%
YTD
-83.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

EOSU

1D
-12.47%
1M
-69.95%
6M
-98.57%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.54M$9.75M$17.00M
$1.93M$2.29M$3.56M

CRCD vs. EOSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRCD and EOSU is -0.36, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCD vs. EOSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and T-REX 2X Long EOSE Daily Target ETF (EOSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRCD vs. EOSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRCD vs. EOSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, roughly equal to the maximum EOSU drawdown of -99.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and EOSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCDEOSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.95%

-99.04%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.08%

-99.04%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.23%

-83.83%

+22.60%

Volatility

CRCD vs. EOSU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCDEOSUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

199.82%

242.51%

-42.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

199.82%

242.51%

-42.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

199.82%

242.51%

-42.69%

CRCD vs. EOSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRCD and EOSU have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

CRCD vs. EOSU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRCD nor EOSU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CRCD and EOSU have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRCD and EOSU have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

CRCD and EOSU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CRCD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EOSU is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCD and EOSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer