CRCD vs. EFZ
CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) and EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE) are both Inverse Equities funds. CRCD is actively managed, while EFZ is passively managed. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRCD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EFZ.
Performance
CRCD vs. EFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCD achieves a -83.29% return, which is significantly lower than EFZ's -7.55% return.
CRCD
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- 6M
- -85.88%
- YTD
- -83.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
EFZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -13.76%
- 3Y*
- -8.96%
- 5Y*
- -5.58%
- 10Y*
- -8.13%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.54M | $9.75M | $17.00M | |
| $395.25K | $254.74K | $413.63K |
CRCD vs. EFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | -83.29% | 38.83% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | -7.55% | -4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCD and EFZ is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCD vs. EFZ — Risk / Return Rank
CRCD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EFZ
CRCD vs. EFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD) and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRCD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.78 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRCD vs. EFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCD drawdown since its inception was -96.95%, which is greater than EFZ's maximum drawdown of -88.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCD and EFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.95% | -88.15% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.08% | -87.89% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.23% | -67.23% | +6.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.20% | — |
Volatility
CRCD vs. EFZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCD | EFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 199.82% | 16.75% | +183.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 199.82% | 16.82% | +183.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 199.82% | 17.11% | +182.71% |
CRCD vs. EFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EFZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCD vs. EFZ - Dividend Comparison
CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE | 3.96% | 4.55% | 5.29% | 4.66% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.56% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCD and EFZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EFZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EFZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.
EFZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRCD and 0.95% for EFZ.
Find the right allocation for CRCD and EFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer