CRCA vs. XDSQ
CRCA (ProShares Ultra CRCL) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRCA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRCA achieves a -25.37% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 2.80% return.
CRCA
- 1D
- -20.86%
- 1M
- -48.25%
- YTD
- -25.37%
- 6M
- -39.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- —
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL | -25.37% | -81.81% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.80% | 8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRCA and XDSQ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRCA vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
CRCA
XDSQ
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRCA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.69 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRCA drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCA and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRCA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.02% | -26.06% | -67.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.98% | 0.00% | -87.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.26% | -4.96% | -64.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRCA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 196.79% | 10.56% | +186.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 196.79% | 15.27% | +181.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 196.79% | 15.10% | +181.69% |
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRCA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRCA vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
CRCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL | 2.32% | 1.06% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRCA and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CRCA.
CRCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CRCA and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for CRCA and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer