CRCA vs. TPYP

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

CRCA (ProShares Ultra CRCL) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CRCA is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by ProShares, while TPYP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. CRCA is actively managed, while TPYP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CRCA charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.

Performance

CRCA vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCA achieves a -71.04% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 25.73% return.

CRCA

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -49.35%
• 6M: -69.61%
• YTD: -71.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TPYP

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 6.20%
• 6M: 22.68%
• YTD: 25.73%
• 1Y: 29.16%
• 3Y*: 25.62%
• 5Y*: 19.98%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCA vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL	-71.04%	-84.67%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	25.73%	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCA and TPYP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

CRCA vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TPYP

TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 81
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCA vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra CRCL (CRCA) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRCA	TPYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.00	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.28	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.23	—

Drawdowns

CRCA vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCA drawdown since its inception was -95.56%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCA and TPYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRCA	TPYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.56%	-51.91%	-43.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.56%	-0.80%	-94.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.37%	-7.85%	-65.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRCA	TPYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	194.44%	13.72%	+180.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	194.44%	17.43%	+177.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	194.44%	21.89%	+172.55%

CRCA vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRCA has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRCA vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

CRCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than TPYP's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRCA ProShares Ultra CRCL	7.61%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund	3.14%	3.91%	3.95%	4.83%	4.48%	4.86%	6.14%	4.45%	4.58%	3.71%	3.49%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRCA and TPYP in my portfolio?

CRCA and TPYP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRCA or TPYP?

On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRCA or TPYP?

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CRCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRCA or TPYP?

CRCA has the higher dividend yield at 7.61%, compared with 3.14% for TPYP.

What is the main difference between CRCA and TPYP?

CRCA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TPYP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CRCA and 0.40% for TPYP.