PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CRAK vs. URA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CRAK vs. URA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CRAK returned 13.50%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for URA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRAK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

CRAK vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 29.26% return, which is significantly higher than URA's 6.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CRAK has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 13.50%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.90% annualized return.

CRAK

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
29.26%
6M
26.17%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
13.50%

URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRAK vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		29.26%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CRAK and URA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between CRAK and URA has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CRAK vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CRAK
URA

Energy

98.8%
64.2%

Industrials

4.0%
22.7%

Basic Materials

1.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.9%

Utilities

-

7.4%

Energy

CRAK
98.8%
URA
64.2%

Industrials

CRAK
4.0%
URA
22.7%

Basic Materials

CRAK
1.2%
URA
4.8%

Communication Services

CRAK

-

URA

-

Consumer Cyclical

CRAK

-

URA

-

Consumer Defensive

CRAK

-

URA

-

Financial Services

CRAK

-

URA

-

Healthcare

CRAK

-

URA

-

Real Estate

CRAK

-

URA

-

Technology

CRAK

-

URA
0.9%

Utilities

CRAK

-

URA
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

Global X Uranium ETF

Often compared with CRAK:
CRAK vs. XLECRAK vs. OIHCRAK vs. VDECRAK vs. IEOCRAK vs. USAICRAK vs. EINCCRAK vs. AMLP
Often compared with URA:
URA vs. NLRURA vs. URNMURA vs. NUKZURA vs. CCJURA vs. UUUUURA vs. URANURA vs. SPY

Return for Risk

CRAK vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRAK vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

CRAKURADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.98
0.64

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.91
1.21

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.14

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.49

1.04

+5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.24

2.30

+14.94

CRAK vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRAK Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRAK and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRAK vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and URA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CRAKURADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.80%

-93.54%

+34.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-31.48%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.61%

-37.81%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

-37.90%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

-61.45%

+2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

-48.34%

+41.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.48%

-74.94%

+62.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

14.12%

-10.90%

Volatility

CRAK vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is 5.81%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that CRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CRAKURADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

17.69%

-11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.72%

39.95%

-25.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

51.24%

-32.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.67%

43.96%

-23.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

37.91%

-15.74%

CRAK vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRAK vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than URA's 4.58% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		1.56%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

CRAK and URA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to CRAK (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRAK dropped -58.80% vs URA's -93.54%.

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.90% vs 13.50% for CRAK. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.56% for CRAK.

CRAK is categorized as Energy Equities, while URA is Uranium. CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CRAK and 0.69% for URA.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRAK and URA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer