CRAK vs. PWRZ
CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. CRAK is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRAK charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRAK
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- YTD
- 38.54%
- 1Y
- 53.31%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.95%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 4.19% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and PWRZ is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRAK | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -0.40% | -58.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.40% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -0.31% | -12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.64% | 0.62% | +19.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 0.62% | +20.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 0.62% | +21.57% |
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRAK vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.46% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, CRAK and PWRZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for CRAK and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for CRAK and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer