CQQQ vs. FXP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP).

CQQQ and FXP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. FXP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). It was launched on Nov 8, 2007. Both CQQQ and FXP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CQQQ vs. FXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CQQQ vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-11.50%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	11.77%	-45.32%	-52.46%	12.74%	-11.73%	23.56%	-39.47%	-29.01%	12.45%	-49.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CQQQ achieves a -11.50% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CQQQ has outperformed FXP with an annualized return of 3.76%, while FXP has yielded a comparatively lower -23.48% annualized return.

CQQQ

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -11.62%
• YTD: -11.50%
• 6M: -20.29%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: 0.59%
• 5Y*: -10.73%
• 10Y*: 3.76%

FXP

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 11.77%
• 6M: 25.78%
• 1Y: -12.70%
• 3Y*: -27.68%
• 5Y*: -16.72%
• 10Y*: -23.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CQQQ vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CQQQ has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.

FXP

ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50

CQQQ

Invesco China Technology ETF

Return for Risk

CQQQ vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 18
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 20
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FXP

FXP Risk / Return Rank: 8
FXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FXP Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FXP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CQQQ vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CQQQ	FXP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.19	-0.27	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	-0.07	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.99	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	-0.24	+0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	-0.30	+0.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CQQQ vs. FXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the FXP Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CQQQ and FXP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CQQQ	FXP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19	-0.27	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	-0.27	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	-0.43	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	-0.44	+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between CQQQ and FXP is -0.81. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CQQQ vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison

CQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than FXP's 4.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.45%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50	4.18%	9.57%	3.55%	2.20%	0.06%	0.00%	0.06%	1.20%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CQQQ vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CQQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.99%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CQQQ and FXP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CQQQ	FXP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.99%	-99.94%	+25.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.41%	-52.42%	+28.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.04%	-87.85%	+20.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.99%	-95.29%	+21.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.10%	-99.92%	+43.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.04%	-94.10%	+66.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.99%	42.47%	-33.48%

Volatility

CQQQ vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is 10.60%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 13.95%. This indicates that CQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CQQQ	FXP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.60%	13.95%	-3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.75%	28.87%	-8.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.95%	47.71%	-15.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.72%	63.04%	-25.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.06%	54.96%	-21.90%