PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXR vs. USE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXR vs. USE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than USE's 14.56% return.


CPXR

1D
-5.58%
1M
-13.49%
YTD
2.23%
6M
5.86%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USE

1D
-4.14%
1M
-21.99%
YTD
14.56%
6M
14.00%
1Y
1.04%
3Y*
9.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXR vs. USE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and USE is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXR vs. USE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

USE
USE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
USE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
USE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
USE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
USE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXR vs. USE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPXRUSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.03

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

0.04

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

0.08

+0.49

CPXR vs. USE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the USE Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and USE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. USE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, which is greater than USE's maximum drawdown of -26.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and USE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXRUSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-26.38%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.87%

-26.38%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.22%

-26.38%

+6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.43%

-8.10%

-11.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.05%

13.89%

+12.16%

Volatility

CPXR vs. USE - Volatility Comparison

USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund (USE) at 10.45%. This indicates that CPXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXRUSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.23%

10.45%

+7.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.72%

27.74%

+18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.92%

31.31%

+38.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.43%

27.40%

+41.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.43%

27.40%

+41.03%

CPXR vs. USE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USE's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXR vs. USE - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than USE's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
0.69%0.70%0.00%0.00%
USE
USCF Energy Commodity Strategy Absolute Return Fund
2.67%3.06%38.65%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPXR and USE have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPXR has higher volatility (18.23%) compared to USE (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPXR dropped -47.87% vs USE's -26.38%.

On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 14.65% vs 1.04% for USE. On fees, USE is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, USE has been the lower-risk option at 10.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 14.65% return vs 1.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USE is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

USE has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.69% for CPXR.

CPXR is categorized as Copper, while USE is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.79% for USE.

CPXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXR and USE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer