PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXR vs. CXRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXR vs. CXRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXR achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than CXRN's -13.42% return.


CPXR

1D
-5.10%
1M
21.98%
YTD
21.61%
6M
34.31%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CXRN

1D
-4.40%
1M
-21.78%
YTD
-13.42%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
-23.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXR vs. CXRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
21.61%36.03%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
-13.42%-33.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXR and CXRN is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXR vs. CXRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

CXRN
CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXR vs. CXRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) and Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXRCXRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.91

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

-0.93

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

-1.67

+3.14

CPXR vs. CXRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXR Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the CXRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXR and CXRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXRCXRNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

-0.64

+1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.61

+1.27

Drawdowns

CPXR vs. CXRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXR drawdown since its inception was -47.87%, roughly equal to the maximum CXRN drawdown of -46.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXR and CXRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXRCXRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-46.71%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.87%

-25.27%

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-46.16%

+41.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.88%

-30.08%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

13.97%

+11.97%

Volatility

CPXR vs. CXRN - Volatility Comparison

USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) has a higher volatility of 18.75% compared to Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) at 15.39%. This indicates that CPXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXRCXRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

15.39%

+3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.26%

26.75%

+18.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.77%

36.32%

+32.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.61%

36.90%

+31.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.61%

36.90%

+31.71%

CPXR vs. CXRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXR has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CXRN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPXR vs. CXRN - Dividend Comparison

CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than CXRN's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CPXR
USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF
0.58%0.70%0.00%
CXRN
Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF
2.61%3.30%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPXR and CXRN have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPXR has higher volatility (18.75%) compared to CXRN (15.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPXR dropped -47.87% vs CXRN's -46.71%.

On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 37.97% vs -23.31% for CXRN. On fees, CXRN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CXRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 37.97% return vs -23.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXRN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

CXRN has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.58% for CPXR.

They also come from different issuers: USCF and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 1.20% for CPXR and 0.95% for CXRN.

CPXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXR and CXRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer