PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CPXJ.AS is traded in EUR, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPXJ.AS achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 11.55% return.


CPXJ.AS

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.12%
YTD
9.65%
6M
10.54%
1Y
14.24%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
7.49%

VUAG.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.33%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.57%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CPXJ.AS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
9.65%6.69%11.90%2.33%-0.55%12.79%-2.03%4.29%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
11.55%3.66%33.47%22.20%-13.58%39.49%184.70%12.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.60

The correlation between CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPXJ.AS
CPXJ.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CPXJ.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXJ.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPXJ.ASVUAG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.61

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

13.16

-6.51

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPXJ.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPXJ.ASVUAG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

2.27

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.98

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.89

-0.54

Drawdowns

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPXJ.AS drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than VUAG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPXJ.ASVUAG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-33.02%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.20%

-7.11%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-22.34%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.95%

-22.34%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.39%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.66%

-4.14%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.95%

+0.18%

Volatility

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (CPXJ.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 2.16%. This indicates that CPXJ.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPXJ.ASVUAG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.16%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

7.44%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

11.31%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

15.10%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

36.41%

-19.93%

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPXJ.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CPXJ.AS vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPXJ.AS nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CPXJ.AS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CPXJ.AS.

CPXJ.AS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. CPXJ.AS tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CPXJ.AS and 0.07% for VUAG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPXJ.AS and VUAG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer