CPTL vs. CNAV

Last updated Jul 23, 2026

CPTL (Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. CPTL is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. CPTL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

CPTL vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CPTL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CNAV

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -15.14%
• 6M: 25.39%
• YTD: 32.33%
• 1Y: 49.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	$256.37K	$424.80K	$328.22K
CPTL Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF	$950.92K	$950.92K	$950.92K

CPTL vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CPTL Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF	-0.24%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	-0.25%

Return for Risk

CPTL vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 63
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPTL vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Morningstar Capital Allocation Leaders ETF (CPTL) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPTL	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.98	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.71	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.62	—

Drawdowns

CPTL vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPTL drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPTL and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPTL	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-30.06%	+29.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-15.14%	+14.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-5.61%	+5.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPTL	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	32.94%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	30.84%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	30.84%	—

CPTL vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPTL vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPTL nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CPTL or CNAV?

On fees, CPTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPTL or CNAV?

CPTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPTL or CNAV?

CPTL and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CPTL and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPTL and 1.31% for CNAV.