CPSP vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPSP (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CPSP is a S&P 500 fund actively managed by Calamos, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. CPSP is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSP returned 7.13% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. CPSP charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

CPSP vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSP achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

CPSP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSP vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPSP Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	3.18%	5.46%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSP and BNO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

CPSP vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSP

CPSP Risk / Return Rank: 98
CPSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CPSP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CPSP Martin Ratio Rank: 99

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSP vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPSP	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.08	2.23	+2.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.15	2.73	+6.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.31	1.38	+0.93
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	19.11	5.17	+13.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	96.35	9.76	+86.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPSP vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSP Sharpe Ratio is 5.08, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSP and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPSP	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.08	2.23	+2.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.17	0.14	+3.03

Drawdowns

CPSP vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSP drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSP and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSP	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-87.06%	+85.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.37%	-17.87%	+17.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-10.29%	+10.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-40.17%	+40.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.07%	9.45%	-9.38%

Volatility

CPSP vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPSP) is 0.32%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that CPSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSP	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	14.22%	-13.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.84%	36.10%	-35.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42%	41.46%	-40.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.37%	35.38%	-33.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.37%	36.68%	-34.31%

CPSP vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSP has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPSP vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSP nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPSP and BNO in my portfolio?

CPSP and BNO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPSP or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to CPSP (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSP dropped -1.73% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, CPSP or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs 7.13% for CPSP. On fees, CPSP is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSP has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPSP or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPSP or BNO?

CPSP is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPSP or BNO?

CPSP and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CPSP and BNO?

CPSP is categorized as S&P 500, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSP and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.