PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSO vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSO vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSO achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.


CPSO

1D
0.17%
1M
0.60%
6M
3.06%
YTD
3.56%
1Y
6.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.87%

NVDO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
10.90%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$74.80K$43.90K$28.49K
$0.00$0.00$23.88K

CPSO vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSO and NVDO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSO vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CPSO
CPSO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CPSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CPSO vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPSONVDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.90

CPSO vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPSO vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSO and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSONVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-16.25%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.73%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-4.95%

+4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

Volatility

CPSO vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSONVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

30.29%

-28.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.96%

30.29%

-27.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.96%

30.29%

-27.33%

CPSO vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPSO vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

CPSO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPSO and NVDO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPSO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPSO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for CPSO.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPSO and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSO and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer