PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSO vs. CVRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSO vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSO achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 40.89% return.


CPSO

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.72%
6M
3.00%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVRT

1D
-1.21%
1M
8.71%
YTD
40.89%
6M
41.79%
1Y
76.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSO vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSO and CVRT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.63

The correlation between CPSO and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSO vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSO
CPSO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CPSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSO vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSOCVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.59

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

8.91

-3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.43

34.91

-9.48

CPSO vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSO Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is comparable to the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSO and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSOCVRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

3.57

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.96

1.84

+0.11

Drawdowns

CPSO vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSO drawdown since its inception was -3.23%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSO and CVRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSOCVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-20.71%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-8.60%

+7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.21%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-3.06%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

2.19%

-1.90%

Volatility

CPSO vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CPSO) is 0.33%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that CPSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSOCVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

7.64%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

17.57%

-15.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

21.47%

-19.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.02%

19.96%

-16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.02%

19.96%

-16.94%

CPSO vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPSO and CVRT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

CPSO vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CPSO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPSO
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.43%1.68%1.49%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPSO and CVRT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to CPSO (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSO dropped -3.23% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 7.29% for CPSO. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPSO has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSO and CVRT have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for CPSO.

CPSO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds.

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSO and CVRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer