PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSL vs. TWOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSL vs. TWOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSL achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than TWOX's 2.15% return.


CPSL

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
2.71%
6M
3.02%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TWOX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.50%
YTD
2.15%
6M
3.54%
1Y
16.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSL vs. TWOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSL and TWOX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025

0.75

The correlation between CPSL and TWOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSL vs. TWOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSL
CPSL Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CPSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TWOX
TWOX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TWOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TWOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSL vs. TWOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSLTWOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.32

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

1.70

+4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.16

8.04

+23.12

CPSL vs. TWOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSL Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the TWOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSL and TWOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSLTWOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.55

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

0.67

+1.34

Drawdowns

CPSL vs. TWOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSL drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum TWOX drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSL and TWOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSLTWOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-19.35%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.18%

-9.51%

+8.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.02%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-2.64%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

2.01%

-1.78%

Volatility

CPSL vs. TWOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is 0.39%, while iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that CPSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPSLTWOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

0.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

8.25%

-6.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

10.44%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.34%

16.78%

-13.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.34%

16.78%

-13.44%

CPSL vs. TWOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TWOX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPSL vs. TWOX - Dividend Comparison

CPSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPSL and TWOX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWOX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to CPSL (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSL dropped -3.72% vs TWOX's -19.35%.

On 1-year performance, TWOX leads with 16.12% vs 7.09% for CPSL. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TWOX has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CPSL.

TWOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for CPSL.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CPSL and 0.50% for TWOX.

CPSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPSL and TWOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer