CPSL vs. TWOX
CPSL (Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF) and TWOX (iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CPSL returned 7.09% vs 16.12% for TWOX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPSL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TWOX.
Performance
CPSL vs. TWOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPSL achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly higher than TWOX's 2.15% return.
CPSL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 7.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TWOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPSL vs. TWOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 2.71% | 6.04% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 2.15% | 13.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPSL and TWOX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.75 |
The correlation between CPSL and TWOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPSL vs. TWOX — Risk / Return Rank
CPSL
TWOX
CPSL vs. TWOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPSL | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.32 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.04 | 1.70 | +4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.16 | 8.04 | +23.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPSL | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 1.55 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.01 | 0.67 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
CPSL vs. TWOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPSL drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum TWOX drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSL and TWOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPSL | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -19.35% | +15.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.18% | -9.51% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.02% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -2.64% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 2.01% | -1.78% |
Volatility
CPSL vs. TWOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is 0.39%, while iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that CPSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPSL | TWOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.49% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.57% | 8.25% | -6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35% | 10.44% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 16.78% | -13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.34% | 16.78% | -13.44% |
CPSL vs. TWOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPSL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TWOX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPSL vs. TWOX - Dividend Comparison
CPSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TWOX iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF | 0.55% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPSL and TWOX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TWOX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to CPSL (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPSL dropped -3.72% vs TWOX's -19.35%.
On 1-year performance, TWOX leads with 16.12% vs 7.09% for CPSL. On fees, TWOX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPSL has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TWOX has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWOX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CPSL.
TWOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for CPSL.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CPSL and 0.50% for TWOX.
CPSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPSL and TWOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer