CPSL vs. CVRT
CPSL (Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — CPSL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CPSL returned 9.02% vs 70.27% for CVRT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPSL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CVRT.
Performance
CPSL vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPSL achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 21.33% return.
CPSL
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVRT
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 12.00%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 70.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPSL vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.27% | 6.43% | 2.32% |
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 21.33% | 29.37% | 11.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPSL and CVRT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CPSL and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPSL vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank
CPSL
CVRT
CPSL vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPSL | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 3.46 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.31 | 4.23 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.59 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.59 | 8.71 | -2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.84 | 35.80 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPSL | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 3.46 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.85 | 1.57 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
CPSL vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPSL drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSL and CVRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPSL | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -20.71% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.34% | -8.60% | +7.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -3.18% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.27% | 2.09% | -1.82% |
Volatility
CPSL vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is 1.13%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that CPSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPSL | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | 9.28% | -8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 18.23% | -16.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 20.55% | -17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 19.79% | -16.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.47% | 19.79% | -16.32% |
CPSL vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPSL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPSL vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison
CPSL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 1.47% | 1.68% | 1.49% | 0.32% |