CPRT vs. WSM
CPRT (Copart, Inc.) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. CPRT operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CPRT returned 17.57%/yr vs 27.10%/yr for WSM. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPRT vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPRT achieves a -21.46% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 26.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CPRT has underperformed WSM with an annualized return of 17.57%, while WSM has yielded a comparatively higher 27.10% annualized return.
CPRT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -21.46%
- 6M
- -20.48%
- 1Y
- -36.72%
- 3Y*
- -10.83%
- 5Y*
- -0.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
WSM
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 32.55%
- YTD
- 26.06%
- 6M
- 20.02%
- 1Y
- 47.32%
- 3Y*
- 53.75%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.10%
CPRT vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | -21.46% | -31.78% | 17.12% | 60.95% | -19.68% | 19.15% | 39.93% | 90.33% | 10.63% | 55.89% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 26.06% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -30.49% | 68.60% | 42.38% | 50.07% | 0.61% | 10.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPRT and WSM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1994 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CPRT and WSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CPRT:
$29.68B
WSM:
$26.80B
CPRT:
$1.59
WSM:
$8.93
CPRT:
19.28
WSM:
25.04
CPRT:
1.49
WSM:
5.06
CPRT:
6.46
WSM:
3.46
CPRT:
3.38
WSM:
14.33
CPRT:
$4.64B
WSM:
$7.88B
CPRT:
$2.11B
WSM:
$3.63B
CPRT:
$2.00B
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPRT vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
CPRT
WSM
CPRT vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPRT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.23 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.01 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | 4.55 | -6.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPRT vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPRT drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRT and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPRT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.49% | -89.01% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.26% | -23.27% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.46% | -36.79% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.46% | -51.92% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.46% | -59.71% | +7.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.83% | 0.00% | -51.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.57% | -25.03% | +8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.06% | 10.25% | +11.81% |
Volatility
CPRT vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is 8.74%, while Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a volatility of 12.02%. This indicates that CPRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPRT | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.74% | 12.02% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 25.57% | -6.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.70% | 34.63% | -10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 44.77% | -18.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 44.26% | -16.83% |
Dividends
CPRT vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
CPRT vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Copart, Inc. and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPRT vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
CPRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a gross profit of 572.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
CPRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported an operating income of 464.28M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
CPRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Copart, Inc. reported a net income of 402.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPRT and WSM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSM has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to CPRT (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRT dropped -72.49% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPRT and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer