CPRT vs. SMH
CPRT (Copart, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CPRT returned 17.51%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPRT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPRT achieves a -21.40% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CPRT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.51%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
CPRT
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -21.40%
- 6M
- -20.70%
- 1Y
- -38.92%
- 3Y*
- -11.41%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.51%
SMH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 20.06%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 74.08%
- 1Y
- 150.04%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- 38.76%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
CPRT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | -21.40% | -31.78% | 17.12% | 60.95% | -19.68% | 19.15% | 39.93% | 90.33% | 10.63% | 55.89% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.25% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPRT and SMH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000 | 0.43 |
The correlation between CPRT and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPRT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CPRT
SMH
CPRT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.69 | -0.99 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 10.11 | -11.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.78 | 38.76 | -40.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.65 | 4.94 | -6.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.11 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 1.15 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.34 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
CPRT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPRT drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.49% | -84.96% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.90% | -14.93% | -24.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.46% | -35.74% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.46% | -45.30% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.46% | -45.30% | -7.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.80% | -1.63% | -50.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -41.08% | +24.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.91% | 3.89% | +18.02% |
Volatility
CPRT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is 9.00%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that CPRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 11.58% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.70% | 24.35% | -5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 30.57% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.95% | 35.01% | -9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.43% | 32.57% | -5.14% |
Dividends
CPRT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPRT and SMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to CPRT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRT dropped -72.49% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPRT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer