CPRT vs. SMH
CPRT (Copart, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CPRT returned 16.40%/yr vs 35.15%/yr for SMH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPRT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPRT achieves a -27.74% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 57.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CPRT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 16.40%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 35.15% annualized return.
CPRT
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- 6M
- -31.42%
- YTD
- -27.74%
- 1Y
- -38.47%
- 3Y*
- -15.49%
- 5Y*
- -4.19%
- 10Y*
- 16.40%
SMH
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 57.98%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- 36.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.15%
CPRT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | -27.74% | -31.78% | 17.12% | 60.95% | -19.68% | 19.15% | 39.93% | 90.33% | 10.63% | 55.89% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 57.98% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPRT and SMH is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.42 |
The correlation between CPRT and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPRT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CPRT
SMH
CPRT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.41 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 6.54 | -7.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 20.41 | -21.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPRT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPRT drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.49% | -84.96% | +12.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.41% | -14.95% | -30.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.27% | -35.74% | -21.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.27% | -45.30% | -11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.27% | -45.30% | -11.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.69% | -14.95% | -40.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -40.93% | +24.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.14% | 4.78% | +20.36% |
Volatility
CPRT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) is 13.24%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that CPRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPRT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.24% | 17.01% | -3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.92% | 31.61% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.34% | 36.97% | -10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.49% | 36.21% | -9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 33.16% | -5.49% |
Dividends
CPRT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPRT Copart, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPRT and SMH have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to CPRT (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRT dropped -72.49% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPRT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer