CPRT vs. MC.PA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CPRT (Copart, Inc.) and MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) are both stocks. CPRT operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CPRT returned 17.57%/yr vs 16.47%/yr for MC.PA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CPRT is traded in USD, while MC.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MC.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CPRT having a -21.46% return and MC.PA slightly higher at -20.77%. Over the past 10 years, CPRT has outperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 17.57%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 16.47% annualized return.

CPRT

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: -21.46%
• 6M: -20.48%
• 1Y: -36.72%
• 3Y*: -10.83%
• 5Y*: -0.30%
• 10Y*: 17.57%

MC.PA

• 1D: 3.42%
• 1M: 9.82%
• YTD: -20.77%
• 6M: -18.13%
• 1Y: 13.59%
• 3Y*: -11.43%
• 5Y*: -4.26%
• 10Y*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CPRT Copart, Inc.	-21.46%	-31.78%	17.12%	60.95%	-19.68%	19.15%	39.93%	90.33%	10.63%	55.89%
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	-20.77%	17.89%	-17.19%	13.07%	-10.48%	34.03%	35.70%	60.00%	2.30%	57.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CPRT and MC.PA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007	0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between CPRT and MC.PA has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CPRT vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRT

CPRT Risk / Return Rank: 2
CPRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CPRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CPRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CPRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CPRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MC.PA

MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 52
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Copart, Inc. (CPRT) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPRT	MC.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.63	0.35	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.38	0.76	-3.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	1.09	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	0.37	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.75	0.74	-2.49

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRT Sharpe Ratio is -1.63, which is lower than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRT and MC.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRT drawdown since its inception was -72.49%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -60.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRT and MC.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRT	MC.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.49%	-60.79%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.26%	-30.86%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.46%	-46.71%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.46%	-46.71%	-5.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.46%	-46.71%	-5.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.83%	-36.98%	-14.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.57%	-13.53%	-3.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.06%	15.44%	+6.62%

Volatility

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

Copart, Inc. (CPRT) has a higher volatility of 8.74% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 8.30%. This indicates that CPRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRT	MC.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.74%	8.30%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.69%	22.76%	-4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.70%	32.62%	-8.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.94%	32.30%	-6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.43%	29.73%	-2.30%

Dividends

CPRT vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

CPRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MC.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CPRT Copart, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne	2.55%	2.02%	2.05%	1.70%	1.76%	0.96%	0.90%	1.50%	2.09%	1.71%	1.98%	2.28%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPRT and MC.PA in my portfolio?

CPRT and MC.PA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.