CPRJ vs. DBE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CPRJ (Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CPRJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MerQube Cap Protect US Small Cap PR Index - Jul, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CPRJ returned 10.96% vs 82.31% for DBE. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. CPRJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.

Performance

CPRJ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRJ achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.50% return.

CPRJ

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 10.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBE

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -3.65%
• YTD: 79.50%
• 6M: 72.59%
• 1Y: 82.31%
• 3Y*: 22.48%
• 5Y*: 19.20%
• 10Y*: 11.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRJ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPRJ Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	3.03%	5.04%	4.75%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	79.50%	-2.17%	-7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CPRJ and DBE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CPRJ and DBE has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

CPRJ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRJ

CPRJ Risk / Return Rank: 90
CPRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CPRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CPRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CPRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CPRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

DBE

DBE Risk / Return Rank: 71
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRJ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPRJ	DBE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.37	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	2.91	+1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.39	+0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.96	6.10	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.46	11.98	+16.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPRJ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRJ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPRJ	DBE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.37	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.09	+1.23

Drawdowns

CPRJ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRJ drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRJ and DBE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRJ	DBE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.25%	-86.69%	+80.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.79%	-14.41%	+12.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-31.85%	+31.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-57.31%	+56.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.38%	7.34%	-6.96%

Volatility

CPRJ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CPRJ) is 0.34%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that CPRJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRJ	DBE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	13.47%	-13.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.63%	30.80%	-29.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	35.02%	-30.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.14%	29.37%	-24.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.14%	28.33%	-23.19%

CPRJ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPRJ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

CPRJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CPRJ Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund	2.15%	3.86%	6.32%	3.87%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	1.79%	1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPRJ and DBE in my portfolio?

CPRJ and DBE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPRJ or DBE?

DBE has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to CPRJ (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRJ dropped -6.25% vs DBE's -86.69%.

Which ETF is better, CPRJ or DBE?

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 82.31% vs 10.96% for CPRJ. On fees, CPRJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPRJ or DBE?

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 82.31% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPRJ or DBE?

CPRJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPRJ or DBE?

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for CPRJ.

What is the main difference between CPRJ and DBE?

CPRJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. CPRJ tracks MerQube Cap Protect US Small Cap PR Index - Jul, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRJ and 0.78% for DBE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.