PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPRA vs. CAIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPRA vs. CAIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRA achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than CAIE's 9.42% return.


CPRA

1D
0.13%
1M
0.57%
YTD
3.90%
6M
4.40%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAIE

1D
0.33%
1M
3.38%
YTD
9.42%
6M
9.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRA vs. CAIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPRA and CAIE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPRA vs. CAIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRA
CPRA Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CPRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPRA Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CPRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPRA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRA vs. CAIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPRACAIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.41

CPRA vs. CAIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPRACAIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

2.34

+1.00

Drawdowns

CPRA vs. CAIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRA drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum CAIE drawdown of -7.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRA and CAIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPRACAIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-7.73%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-1.05%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.17%

Volatility

CPRA vs. CAIE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPRACAIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

11.91%

-9.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

11.91%

-9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.80%

11.91%

-9.11%

CPRA vs. CAIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPRA vs. CAIE - Dividend Comparison

CPRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPRA and CAIE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CPRA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CPRA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIE.

CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 13.05%, compared with 0.00% for CPRA.

CPRA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CAIE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRA and 0.74% for CAIE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPRA and CAIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer