CPRA vs. PQJA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CPRA (Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and PQJA (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CPRA returned 9.53% vs 22.45% for PQJA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPRA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQJA.

Performance

CPRA vs. PQJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPRA achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than PQJA's 8.72% return.

CPRA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 3.90%
• 6M: 4.40%
• 1Y: 9.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQJA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 6M: 9.99%
• 1Y: 22.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPRA vs. PQJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPRA Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	3.90%	6.88%
PQJA PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January	8.72%	20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CPRA and PQJA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	0.62

The correlation between CPRA and PQJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPRA vs. PQJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPRA

CPRA Risk / Return Rank: 97
CPRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CPRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CPRA Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CPRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CPRA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PQJA

PQJA Risk / Return Rank: 82
PQJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PQJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PQJA Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PQJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PQJA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPRA vs. PQJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPRA	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.19	2.74	+1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.25	3.90	+3.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.99	1.55	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.73	3.33	+7.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	55.41	16.19	+39.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPRA vs. PQJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPRA Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the PQJA Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPRA and PQJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPRA	PQJA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.19	2.74	+1.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.35	1.39	+1.96

Drawdowns

CPRA vs. PQJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPRA drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum PQJA drawdown of -14.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPRA and PQJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPRA	PQJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-14.72%	+13.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.89%	-6.77%	+5.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.09%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.15%	-1.65%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	1.39%	-1.22%

Volatility

CPRA vs. PQJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CPRA) is 0.58%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January (PQJA) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that CPRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPRA	PQJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.58%	1.14%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.20%	6.66%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29%	8.23%	-5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.80%	13.40%	-10.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.80%	13.40%	-10.60%

CPRA vs. PQJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPRA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PQJA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPRA vs. PQJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPRA nor PQJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPRA and PQJA in my portfolio?

CPRA and PQJA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPRA or PQJA?

PQJA has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to CPRA (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPRA dropped -1.69% vs PQJA's -14.72%.

Which ETF is better, CPRA or PQJA?

On 1-year performance, PQJA leads with 22.45% vs 9.53% for CPRA. On fees, PQJA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CPRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPRA or PQJA?

Over the 1-year period, PQJA has performed better with a 22.45% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPRA or PQJA?

PQJA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPRA or PQJA?

CPRA and PQJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CPRA and PQJA?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPRA and 0.50% for PQJA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.