CPP.L vs. IPAV
CPP.L (CPPGroup plc) is a stock, while IPAV (Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. Index. Over the past year, CPP.L returned -82.72% vs 14.44% for IPAV. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CPP.L is traded in GBp, while IPAV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IPAV values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPP.L achieves a -70.21% return, which is significantly lower than IPAV's 6.30% return.
CPP.L
- 1D
- -20.75%
- 1M
- -65.71%
- 6M
- -74.23%
- YTD
- -70.21%
- 1Y
- -82.72%
- 3Y*
- -51.54%
- 5Y*
- -45.45%
- 10Y*
- -28.56%
- ALL TIME*
- -34.95%
IPAV
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 14.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.90%
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CPP.L CPPGroup plc | -70.21% | -36.49% | -23.45% |
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 6.30% | 20.52% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPP.L and IPAV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPP.L vs. IPAV — Risk / Return Rank
CPP.L
IPAV
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CPPGroup plc (CPP.L) and Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPP.L | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.63 | 1.18 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | 1.08 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | 3.45 | -5.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.93%, which is greater than IPAV's maximum drawdown of -13.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPP.L and IPAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPP.L | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.93% | -13.48% | -86.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -87.04% | -13.48% | -73.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -10.51% | -89.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -2.36% | -87.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.70% | 4.20% | +47.50% |
Volatility
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Volatility Comparison
CPPGroup plc (CPP.L) has a higher volatility of 61.06% compared to Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF (IPAV) at 4.54%. This indicates that CPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPP.L | IPAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.06% | 4.54% | +56.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.79% | 14.19% | +67.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.13% | 15.91% | +67.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.89% | 15.94% | +42.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.87% | 15.94% | +53.93% |
Dividends
CPP.L vs. IPAV - Dividend Comparison
CPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPP.L CPPGroup plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.82% | 8.45% |
IPAV Global X Infrastructure Development ex-U.S. ETF | 1.54% | 1.29% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPP.L and IPAV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CPP.L and IPAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer