CPNS vs. LJUL

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

CPNS (Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September) and LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. CPNS is passively managed, while LJUL is actively managed. Over the past year, CPNS returned 9.57% vs 7.15% for LJUL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPNS charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LJUL.

Performance

CPNS vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CPNS having a 1.15% return and LJUL slightly higher at 1.16%.

CPNS

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 9.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNS vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPNS Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September	1.15%	7.25%	2.79%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	1.16%	5.91%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CPNS and LJUL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.65

The correlation between CPNS and LJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 — a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPNS vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNS

CPNS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CPNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPNS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CPNS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LJUL

LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 97
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNS vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPNS	LJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	3.77	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.71	6.40	-0.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.85	1.99	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.04	12.56	-5.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	34.02	59.04	-25.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPNS vs. LJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPNS Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the LJUL Sharpe Ratio of 3.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPNS and LJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPNS	LJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	3.77	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.97	1.75	+0.22

Drawdowns

CPNS vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNS drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, which is greater than LJUL's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNS and LJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPNS	LJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-3.21%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.31%	-0.53%	-0.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-0.12%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	0.11%	+0.16%

Volatility

CPNS vs. LJUL - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL) at 0.69%. This indicates that CPNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPNS	LJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	0.69%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.87%	1.33%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74%	1.92%	+0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.60%	3.37%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.60%	3.37%	+0.23%

CPNS vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPNS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPNS vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison

CPNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%.

	TTM	2025	2024
CPNS Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	5.28%	5.36%	2.78%