PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPNS vs. CVRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPNS vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPNS achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 21.33% return.


CPNS

1D
0.17%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.96%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CVRT

1D
1.03%
1M
12.00%
YTD
21.33%
6M
23.00%
1Y
70.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNS vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPNS and CVRT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.66

The correlation between CPNS and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 — a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPNS vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNS
CPNS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CPNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPNS Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CPNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPNS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNS vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPNSCVRTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.54

3.46

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.71

4.23

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.59

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.04

8.71

-1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

34.02

35.80

-1.78

CPNS vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPNS Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPNS and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPNSCVRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

3.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

1.57

+0.39

Drawdowns

CPNS vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNS drawdown since its inception was -3.99%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNS and CVRT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPNSCVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-20.71%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

-8.60%

+7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-3.18%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

2.09%

-1.82%

Volatility

CPNS vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) is 1.15%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that CPNS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPNSCVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

9.28%

-8.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

18.23%

-16.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

20.55%

-17.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.60%

19.79%

-16.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.60%

19.79%

-16.19%

CPNS vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPNS and CVRT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

CPNS vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CPNS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.