CPNM vs. CVRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPNM (Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPNM is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index Price Return, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. CPNM is passively managed, while CVRT is actively managed. Over the past year, CPNM returned 8.01% vs 76.22% for CVRT. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CPNM vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March (CPNM) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPNM achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 40.89% return.

CPNM

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 2.97%
• 6M: 3.58%
• 1Y: 8.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVRT

• 1D: -1.21%
• 1M: 8.71%
• YTD: 40.89%
• 6M: 41.79%
• 1Y: 76.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNM vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPNM Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March	2.97%	6.65%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	40.89%	31.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CPNM and CVRT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.62

The correlation between CPNM and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CPNM vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNM

CPNM Risk / Return Rank: 97
CPNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CPNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CPNM Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CPNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CPNM Martin Ratio Rank: 97

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 93
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNM vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March (CPNM) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPNM	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.18	3.57	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.02	4.32	+2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.95	1.59	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.80	8.91	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	43.66	34.91	+8.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPNM vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPNM Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is comparable to the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPNM and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPNM	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.18	3.57	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.77	1.84	+0.93

Drawdowns

CPNM vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNM drawdown since its inception was -1.91%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNM and CVRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPNM	CVRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-20.71%	+18.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.03%	-8.60%	+7.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-1.21%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-3.06%	+2.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	2.19%	-2.01%

Volatility

CPNM vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March (CPNM) is 0.51%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that CPNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPNM	CVRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.51%	7.64%	-7.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.36%	17.57%	-16.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93%	21.47%	-19.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.81%	19.96%	-17.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.81%	19.96%	-17.15%

CPNM vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CPNM and CVRT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CPNM vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CPNM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CVRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CPNM Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.43%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPNM and CVRT in my portfolio?

CPNM and CVRT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPNM or CVRT?

CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to CPNM (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPNM dropped -1.91% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

Which ETF is better, CPNM or CVRT?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 8.01% for CPNM. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CPNM has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPNM or CVRT?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPNM or CVRT?

CPNM and CVRT have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPNM or CVRT?

CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for CPNM.

What is the main difference between CPNM and CVRT?

CPNM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CPNM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 3.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.