PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPNJ vs. CAIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPNJ) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPNJ achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly lower than CAIE's 8.71% return.


CPNJ

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.33%
6M
1.72%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAIE

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.33%
6M
7.62%
YTD
8.71%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPNJ and CAIE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.71

The correlation between CPNJ and CAIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPNJ vs. CAIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNJ
CPNJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CPNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CPNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CAIE
CAIE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CAIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPNJ) and Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CPNJCAIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

2.65

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.85

11.32

+9.53

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPNJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the CAIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPNJ and CAIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNJ drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum CAIE drawdown of -7.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNJ and CAIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPNJCAIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-7.73%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-7.73%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.73%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-1.10%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.81%

-1.56%

Volatility

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPNJ) is 1.03%, while Calamos Autocallable Income ETF (CAIE) has a volatility of 2.20%. This indicates that CPNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPNJCAIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

2.20%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

8.33%

-6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

11.87%

-9.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

11.79%

-6.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

11.79%

-6.75%

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPNJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIE's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPNJ vs. CAIE - Dividend Comparison

CPNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.47%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CPNJ and CAIE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAIE has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to CPNJ (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPNJ dropped -5.99% vs CAIE's -7.73%.

On 1-year performance, CAIE leads with 20.40% vs 5.12% for CPNJ. On fees, CPNJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPNJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CAIE has performed better with a 20.40% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPNJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIE.

CAIE has the higher dividend yield at 14.47%, compared with 0.00% for CPNJ.

CPNJ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CAIE is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPNJ and 0.74% for CAIE.

CPNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPNJ and CAIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer