CPNJ vs. QEW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CPNJ (Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. CPNJ is actively managed, while QEW is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CPNJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.

Performance

CPNJ vs. QEW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPNJ) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CPNJ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 6M: 2.99%
• 1Y: 6.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QEW

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 10.55%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPNJ vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CPNJ Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June	1.90%
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF	21.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CPNJ and QEW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

CPNJ vs. QEW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPNJ

CPNJ Risk / Return Rank: 94
CPNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CPNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CPNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CPNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPNJ vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPNJ) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPNJ	QEW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.39	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	37.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPNJ	QEW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.63	9.75	-8.12

Drawdowns

CPNJ vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPNJ drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNJ and QEW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPNJ	QEW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-4.15%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.57%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPNJ	QEW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03%	15.78%	-13.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.08%	15.78%	-10.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.08%	15.78%	-10.70%

CPNJ vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPNJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPNJ vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPNJ nor QEW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPNJ and QEW in my portfolio?

CPNJ and QEW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CPNJ or QEW?

On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPNJ or QEW?

QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CPNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPNJ or QEW?

CPNJ and QEW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CPNJ and QEW?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CPNJ and 0.25% for QEW.