CPNG vs. PPLT
CPNG (Coupang, Inc.) is a stock, while PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). Over the past 5 years, CPNG returned -15.31%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPNG vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPNG achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's -16.64% return.
CPNG
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 6M
- -34.37%
- 1Y
- -40.14%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PPLT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
CPNG vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPNG Coupang, Inc. | -28.70% | 7.32% | 35.76% | 10.06% | -49.93% | -53.73% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -16.64% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -20.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPNG and PPLT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPNG vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
CPNG
PPLT
CPNG vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPNG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.15 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.80 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 1.84 | -3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPNG vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPNG drawdown since its inception was -85.28%, which is greater than PPLT's maximum drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPNG and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPNG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -70.73% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.91% | -40.02% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.91% | -40.02% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.01% | -40.02% | -38.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.51% | -38.39% | -35.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -39.94% | -24.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.85% | 17.37% | +13.48% |
Volatility
CPNG vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
Coupang, Inc. (CPNG) has a higher volatility of 21.03% compared to Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) at 11.07%. This indicates that CPNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPNG | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.03% | 11.07% | +9.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.57% | 45.24% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.14% | 50.99% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.50% | 32.68% | +19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.74% | 29.10% | +24.64% |
Dividends
CPNG vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPNG nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPNG and PPLT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPNG has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to PPLT (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPNG dropped -85.28% vs PPLT's -70.73%.
PPLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPNG and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer