CPLS vs. UGA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CPLS (AB Core Plus Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CPLS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. CPLS is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, CPLS returned 5.29% vs 82.09% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. CPLS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

CPLS vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.83% return.

CPLS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -8.95%
• YTD: 75.83%
• 6M: 64.53%
• 1Y: 82.09%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 25.18%
• 10Y*: 14.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLS vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	0.53%	6.91%	1.65%	1.21%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	75.83%	-2.00%	3.77%	3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLS and UGA is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	-0.26

The correlation between CPLS and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.43 (1 year) to -0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CPLS vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLS

CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 39
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 71
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 61
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLS vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPLS	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.35	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.78	-0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.38	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	5.82	-3.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	14.25	-7.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPLS vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLS and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPLS	UGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.35	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.12	+0.75

Drawdowns

CPLS vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPLS	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-86.59%	+82.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-14.88%	+12.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-12.18%	+11.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-36.77%	+35.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	6.08%	-5.30%

Volatility

CPLS vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) is 1.42%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.41%. This indicates that CPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPLS	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	12.41%	-10.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	30.41%	-27.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	35.21%	-31.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.82%	34.38%	-29.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.82%	37.27%	-32.45%

CPLS vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPLS vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	4.61%	4.66%	4.71%	0.23%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPLS and UGA in my portfolio?

CPLS and UGA have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPLS or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (12.41%) compared to CPLS (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLS dropped -4.43% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, CPLS or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 82.09% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPLS or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 82.09% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPLS or UGA?

CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPLS or UGA?

CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between CPLS and UGA?

CPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.