CPLS vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CPLS (AB Core Plus Bond ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - CPLS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. CPLS is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, CPLS returned 5.29% vs 89.50% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. CPLS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

CPLS vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 86.76% return.

CPLS

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -7.65%
• YTD: 86.76%
• 6M: 83.45%
• 1Y: 89.50%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 23.77%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLS vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	0.53%	6.91%	1.65%	1.21%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	86.76%	-5.44%	9.67%	2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLS and BNO is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023	-0.26

The correlation between CPLS and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (1 year) to -0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CPLS vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLS

CPLS Risk / Return Rank: 39
CPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
CPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLS vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPLS	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.17	-0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.68	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	5.39	-3.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	10.23	-3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPLS vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLS and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPLS	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	2.17	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.14	+0.73

Drawdowns

CPLS vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLS drawdown since its inception was -4.43%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLS and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPLS	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.43%	-87.06%	+82.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-17.87%	+15.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-12.04%	+11.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-40.18%	+38.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	9.43%	-8.65%

Volatility

CPLS vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Core Plus Bond ETF (CPLS) is 1.42%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that CPLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPLS	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	15.03%	-13.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	36.08%	-33.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	41.56%	-37.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.82%	35.37%	-30.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.82%	36.68%	-31.86%

CPLS vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPLS vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

CPLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CPLS AB Core Plus Bond ETF	4.61%	4.66%	4.71%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPLS and BNO in my portfolio?

CPLS and BNO have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CPLS or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to CPLS (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLS dropped -4.43% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, CPLS or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 89.50% vs 5.29% for CPLS. On fees, CPLS is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, CPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CPLS or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 89.50% return vs 5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPLS or BNO?

CPLS is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPLS or BNO?

CPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between CPLS and BNO?

CPLS is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CPLS and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.