PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPLIX vs. CICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPLIX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CICVX's 26.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CPLIX has underperformed CICVX with an annualized return of 7.02%, while CICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


CPLIX

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.51%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
7.02%

CICVX

1D
1.49%
1M
7.82%
YTD
26.40%
6M
26.09%
1Y
46.23%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPLIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund
-0.36%9.89%8.89%8.04%-0.96%7.52%19.81%3.97%-5.96%9.22%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
26.40%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%0.59%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CPLIX and CICVX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2016

0.48

The correlation between CPLIX and CICVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPLIX vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPLIX
CPLIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CPLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CPLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPLIXCICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.55

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

6.18

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

24.05

-23.13

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the CICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPLIX and CICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPLIXCICVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

3.21

-2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.67

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.98

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.35

+0.13

Drawdowns

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPLIX drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum CICVX drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPLIX and CICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPLIXCICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-49.33%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-7.70%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.73%

-14.79%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.28%

-27.17%

+8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.71%

-27.17%

-6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

0.00%

-4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-17.48%

+12.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

1.98%

+1.58%

Volatility

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund (CPLIX) is 3.83%, while Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that CPLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPLIXCICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

5.22%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

12.17%

-4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

14.86%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.36%

12.89%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.27%

12.89%

+2.38%

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPLIX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than CICVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPLIX vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison

CPLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than CICVX's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
9.97%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%
CPLIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short Fund
5.54%5.52%6.90%1.86%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.43%3.88%1.21%0.85%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPLIX and CICVX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CICVX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to CPLIX (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPLIX dropped -33.71% vs CICVX's -49.33%.

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPLIX and CICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer