CPHY vs. SCYB

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CPHY (F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - CPHY tracks the Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CPHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.

Performance

CPHY vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPHY achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.80% return.

CPHY

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.52%
• 6M: 0.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCYB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 6.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPHY vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF	0.52%	2.43%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.80%	2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CPHY and SCYB is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

CPHY vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 58
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPHY vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF (CPHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CPHY	SCYB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.18	—

Drawdowns

CPHY vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPHY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPHY and SCYB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPHY	SCYB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.51%	-4.92%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.27%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.56%	-0.51%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CPHY	SCYB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	3.78%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.56%	5.11%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.56%	5.11%	-1.55%

CPHY vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPHY vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

CPHY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CPHY F/m Compoundr High Yield Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.92%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CPHY and SCYB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, CPHY and SCYB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CPHY or SCYB?

On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CPHY or SCYB?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CPHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CPHY or SCYB?

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.00% for CPHY.

What is the main difference between CPHY and SCYB?

CPHY tracks Nasdaq Compoundr U.S. High Yield Bond Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CPHY and 0.03% for SCYB.