CPH.TO vs. STRL
CPH.TO (Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and STRL (Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.) are both stocks. CPH.TO operates in Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic (Healthcare), while STRL operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CPH.TO returned 9.46%/yr vs 61.83%/yr for STRL. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CPH.TO is traded in CAD, while STRL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STRL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPH.TO achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 117.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CPH.TO has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 9.46%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 61.83% annualized return.
CPH.TO
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 33.17%
- 3Y*
- 63.60%
- 5Y*
- 58.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.34%
STRL
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -24.99%
- 6M
- 87.01%
- YTD
- 117.36%
- 1Y
- 164.45%
- 3Y*
- 128.55%
- 5Y*
- 101.71%
- 10Y*
- 61.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.70%
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPH.TO Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 9.03% | 5.17% | 158.48% | 44.27% | 116.95% | 90.32% | -38.00% | -12.28% | -65.10% | 0.00% |
STRL Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. | 117.36% | 73.49% | 107.79% | 161.70% | 32.62% | 41.25% | 29.04% | 23.96% | -27.48% | 79.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPH.TO and STRL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2006 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
CPH.TO:
CA$416.93M
STRL:
$19.95B
CPH.TO:
$1.19
STRL:
$11.16
CPH.TO:
9.77
STRL:
58.25
CPH.TO:
0.12
STRL:
1.24
CPH.TO:
5.95
STRL:
7.00
CPH.TO:
2.27
STRL:
16.97
CPH.TO:
$50.92M
STRL:
$2.88B
CPH.TO:
$37.95M
STRL:
$664.66M
CPH.TO:
$25.12M
STRL:
$429.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPH.TO vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank
CPH.TO
STRL
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CPH.TO) and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPH.TO | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 4.72 | -3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 11.89 | -9.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPH.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPH.TO and STRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPH.TO | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.90% | -91.60% | -6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.83% | -35.08% | +12.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.50% | -48.62% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.50% | -48.62% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.31% | -55.77% | -38.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.82% | -33.98% | +17.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.04% | -43.65% | -20.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.95% | 13.90% | -1.95% |
Volatility
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. (CPH.TO) is 5.92%, while Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 22.82%. This indicates that CPH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPH.TO | STRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 22.82% | -16.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.61% | 66.91% | -39.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.38% | 85.38% | -44.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 57.96% | -8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.67% | 54.30% | +6.37% |
Dividends
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CPH.TO nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CPH.TO vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison
CPH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.35M and revenue of 12.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.9%.
STRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
CPH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported an operating income of 5.50M and revenue of 12.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.7%.
STRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
CPH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cipher Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a net income of 6.06M and revenue of 12.30M, resulting in a net margin of 49.3%.
STRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CPH.TO and STRL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CPH.TO and STRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer