CPGAX vs. VMVFX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX).
CPGAX is managed by Pacific LifeFunds. It was launched on May 17, 2012. VMVFX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Dec 12, 2013.
Performance
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPGAX American Funds Global Growth Portfolio | -6.94% | 22.99% | 14.81% | 24.05% | -25.77% | 12.89% | 27.36% | 27.87% | -8.99% | 28.56% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 1.71% | 12.74% | 13.38% | 7.82% | -4.48% | 23.74% | -3.99% | 23.28% | -1.79% | 15.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPGAX achieves a -6.94% return, which is significantly lower than VMVFX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CPGAX has outperformed VMVFX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while VMVFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.02% annualized return.
CPGAX
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -10.78%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -3.43%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
VMVFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 8.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPGAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VMVFX's 0.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CPGAX vs. VMVFX — Risk / Return Rank
CPGAX
VMVFX
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) and Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPGAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.90 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.30 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.06 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 5.20 | +0.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPGAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.90 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.93 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.72 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.78 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPGAX and VMVFX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Dividend Comparison
CPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, less than VMVFX's 9.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPGAX American Funds Global Growth Portfolio | 6.01% | 5.59% | 4.29% | 0.92% | 7.95% | 3.33% | 0.77% | 4.89% | 5.69% | 6.21% | 3.66% | 3.92% |
VMVFX Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares | 9.81% | 9.98% | 3.77% | 3.05% | 4.96% | 12.73% | 2.02% | 5.12% | 7.27% | 2.30% | 2.71% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPGAX drawdown since its inception was -34.42%, roughly equal to the maximum VMVFX drawdown of -33.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPGAX and VMVFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPGAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.42% | -33.09% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -7.96% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.42% | -13.02% | -21.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.42% | -33.09% | -1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -6.03% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -2.84% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.63% | +1.09% |
Volatility
CPGAX vs. VMVFX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds Global Growth Portfolio (CPGAX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Vanguard Global Minimum Volatility Fund Investor Shares (VMVFX) at 2.61%. This indicates that CPGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPGAX | VMVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 2.61% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 4.87% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.07% | 10.02% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 10.75% | +6.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 12.48% | +4.69% |