CPEAX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
CPEAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 22, 2011. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPEAX Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund | -1.23% | 9.98% | 22.02% | 13.44% | -14.87% | 19.59% | 21.00% | 11.14% | -4.35% | 26.91% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -2.49% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPEAX achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly higher than FCGSX's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CPEAX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.96% annualized return.
CPEAX
- 1D
- 4.79%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
FCGSX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 38.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 21.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPEAX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CPEAX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
CPEAX
FCGSX
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPEAX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.66 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.34 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.33 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 2.98 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 13.43 | -7.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPEAX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.66 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.63 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.95 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.88 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between CPEAX and FCGSX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
CPEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.94%, more than FCGSX's 10.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPEAX Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund | 15.94% | 15.75% | 9.57% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 30.88% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 19.37% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 1.36% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 10.74% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPEAX drawdown since its inception was -34.39%, smaller than the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPEAX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPEAX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.39% | -38.77% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.96% | -13.10% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.28% | -38.77% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.39% | -38.77% | +4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.42% | -6.44% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -7.05% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.91% | +0.94% |
Volatility
CPEAX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha Fund (CPEAX) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 8.15%. This indicates that CPEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CPEAX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 8.15% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 14.39% | +2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 24.14% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 23.69% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 23.19% | -2.84% |