CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO
CPD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF) and XGRO.TO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - CPD.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P/TSX Preferred Share TR, while XGRO.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by iShares. CPD.TO is passively managed, while XGRO.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CPD.TO returned 6.38%/yr vs 10.20%/yr for XGRO.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CPD.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XGRO.TO.
Performance
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPD.TO achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than XGRO.TO's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CPD.TO has underperformed XGRO.TO with an annualized return of 6.38%, while XGRO.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.
CPD.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 14.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.38%
XGRO.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF | 3.57% | 16.10% | 23.31% | 6.23% | -19.19% | 18.85% | 5.35% | 3.35% | -9.05% | 13.44% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 10.38% | 15.59% | 19.53% | 15.01% | -11.08% | 14.29% | 11.51% | 17.97% | -6.73% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPD.TO and XGRO.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2007 | 0.24 |
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CPD.TO
XGRO.TO
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CPD.TO
XGRO.TO
Consumer Defensive
CPD.TO
XGRO.TO
Basic Materials
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Communication Services
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Energy
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Healthcare
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Industrials
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Real Estate
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Technology
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Utilities
CPD.TO
-
XGRO.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CPD.TO
XGRO.TO
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) and iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CPD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.41 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 3.30 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.40 | 14.67 | +11.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | 2.18 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.99 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.35 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPD.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.92%, smaller than the maximum XGRO.TO drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPD.TO and XGRO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.92% | -47.97% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -7.12% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.65% | -12.47% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -18.40% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.92% | -25.85% | -15.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.18% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -8.49% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 1.60% | -1.06% |
Volatility
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF (CPD.TO) is 0.87%, while iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio (XGRO.TO) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that CPD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPD.TO | XGRO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 3.43% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 9.19% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 10.78% | -6.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.71% | 11.05% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 12.26% | -1.64% |
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPD.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XGRO.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPD.TO vs. XGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CPD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than XGRO.TO's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Preferred Share Index ETF | 5.02% | 4.96% | 5.11% | 5.88% | 5.53% | 4.17% | 4.96% | 5.02% | 4.74% | 4.33% | 4.85% | 5.44% |
XGRO.TO iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio | 1.76% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 2.22% | 1.86% | 1.66% | 1.94% | 2.21% | 7.42% | 2.04% | 2.65% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPD.TO and XGRO.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CPD.TO.
CPD.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while XGRO.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CPD.TO and 0.20% for XGRO.TO.
Find the right allocation for CPD.TO and XGRO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer