CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO
CPCC.TO (Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) and PPLN.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CPCC.TO is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index, while PPLN.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CPCC.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for PPLN.TO.
Performance
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPCC.TO achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly lower than PPLN.TO's 29.04% return.
CPCC.TO
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 24.04%
- YTD
- 23.82%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PPLN.TO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 29.04%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 23.82% | 9.59% |
PPLN.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF | 29.04% | -0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CPCC.TO
PPLN.TO
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CPCC.TO | PPLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 0.33 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum PPLN.TO drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPCC.TO | PPLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -59.05% | +31.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -2.93% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.28% | -9.47% | +2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.84% | — |
Volatility
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPCC.TO | PPLN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.17% | 14.40% | +28.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.17% | 17.40% | +25.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.17% | 23.20% | +19.97% |
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLN.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Dividend Comparison
CPCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than PPLN.TO's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPCC.TO Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF | 3.74% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PPLN.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF | 4.26% | 4.35% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.23% | 3.47% | 5.76% | 4.40% | 5.21% | 4.31% | 3.99% | 4.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPLN.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CPCC.TO.
CPCC.TO is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while PPLN.TO is Energy Equities. CPCC.TO tracks Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index, while PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CPCC.TO and 0.31% for PPLN.TO.
Find the right allocation for CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer