PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPCC.TO achieves a 23.82% return, which is significantly lower than PPLN.TO's 29.04% return.


CPCC.TO

1D
-2.96%
1M
24.04%
YTD
23.82%
6M
30.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PPLN.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.16%
YTD
29.04%
6M
28.59%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

-0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPCC.TO

PPLN.TO
PPLN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PPLN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPLN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (CPCC.TO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF (PPLN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPCC.TOPPLN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.98

0.33

+1.64

Drawdowns

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPCC.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum PPLN.TO drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPCC.TOPPLN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-59.05%

+31.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-2.93%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.28%

-9.47%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

Volatility

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPCC.TOPPLN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.17%

14.40%

+28.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.17%

17.40%

+25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.17%

23.20%

+19.97%

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPCC.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PPLN.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPCC.TO vs. PPLN.TO - Dividend Comparison

CPCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than PPLN.TO's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPCC.TO
Global X Copper Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
3.74%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PPLN.TO
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipelines Index ETF
4.26%4.35%2.94%3.77%3.23%3.47%5.76%4.40%5.21%4.31%3.99%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PPLN.TO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PPLN.TO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CPCC.TO.

CPCC.TO is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while PPLN.TO is Energy Equities. CPCC.TO tracks Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index, while PPLN.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CPCC.TO and 0.31% for PPLN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPCC.TO and PPLN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer