CPBYX vs. MCFIX
CPBYX (Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund) and MCFIX (Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, CPBYX returned -0.32%/yr vs -0.77%/yr for MCFIX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. CPBYX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for MCFIX.
Performance
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CPBYX achieves a -0.76% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -2.67% return.
CPBYX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.40%
MCFIX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- -0.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPBYX Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund | -0.76% | 7.38% | 3.52% | 5.51% | -14.41% | -0.34% | 9.85% | 7.42% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | -2.67% | 6.64% | 2.02% | 6.47% | -13.69% | -1.05% | 4.75% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between CPBYX and MCFIX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between CPBYX and MCFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CPBYX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank
CPBYX
MCFIX
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CPBYX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.99 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.05 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | -0.12 | +2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CPBYX drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, roughly equal to the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPBYX and MCFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CPBYX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.73% | -21.68% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -4.08% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.32% | -5.27% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.73% | -18.64% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -7.57% | +5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -8.49% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 1.74% | -0.64% |
Volatility
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) is 0.93%, while Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that CPBYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CPBYX | MCFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 1.04% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.98% | 2.94% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.69% | 4.01% | -0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 6.05% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.69% | 6.07% | -1.38% |
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CPBYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
CPBYX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison
CPBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than MCFIX's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPBYX Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.68% | 4.90% | 3.87% | 3.76% | 3.16% | 5.94% | 4.13% | 3.74% | 3.10% | 3.20% | 3.81% |
MCFIX Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund | 4.38% | 3.89% | 4.54% | 3.68% | 3.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CPBYX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MCFIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to CPBYX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPBYX dropped -20.73% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.
CPBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CPBYX and MCFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer