PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPBYX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPBYX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CPBYX has outperformed GUGAX with an annualized return of 2.54%, while GUGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.


CPBYX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.89%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
2.54%

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
0.82%7.38%3.52%5.51%-14.41%-0.34%9.85%12.26%-2.43%5.38%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CPBYX and GUGAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009

0.79

The correlation between CPBYX and GUGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPBYX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPBYX
CPBYX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CPBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CPBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPBYXGUGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.13

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.47

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

5.57

-3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.11

16.20

-9.09

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPBYX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPBYXGUGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.13

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.05

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.28

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.08

+0.77

Drawdowns

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPBYX drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPBYX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPBYXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-38.57%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-1.16%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-6.12%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-20.53%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.73%

-23.06%

+2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-6.72%

+5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-11.27%

+8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.43%

+0.50%

Volatility

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CPBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPBYXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.00%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

1.43%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

3.05%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

6.57%

-1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.69%

5.43%

-0.74%

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPBYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPBYX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

CPBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
4.63%4.68%4.90%3.87%3.76%3.16%5.94%4.13%3.74%3.10%3.20%3.81%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPBYX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPBYX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPBYX dropped -20.73% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPBYX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer