PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPBYX vs. LCTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPBYX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, CPBYX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.83% annualized return.


CPBYX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.67%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
2.51%

LCTRX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.24%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
0.50%7.38%3.52%5.51%-14.41%-0.34%9.85%12.26%-2.43%5.38%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
1.78%4.72%6.03%8.26%2.22%1.99%12.07%1.15%6.01%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between CPBYX and LCTRX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010

0.20

Over the past year, CPBYX and LCTRX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPBYX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPBYX
CPBYX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CPBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CPBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

LCTRX
LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPBYXLCTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.92

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.14

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

17.19

-10.49

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPBYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the LCTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPBYX and LCTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPBYXLCTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.54

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

2.22

-2.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.77

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.70

+0.14

Drawdowns

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPBYX drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPBYX and LCTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CPBYXLCTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-26.09%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-1.17%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-1.33%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-3.82%

-16.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.73%

-23.93%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.09%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-4.12%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.28%

+0.65%

Volatility

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.59%. This indicates that CPBYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CPBYXLCTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.59%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

1.42%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

1.91%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

2.44%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.69%

6.31%

-1.62%

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPBYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

CPBYX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison

CPBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, less than LCTRX's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
4.65%4.68%4.90%3.87%3.76%3.16%5.94%4.13%3.74%3.10%3.20%3.81%
LCTRX
Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares
5.28%5.53%5.57%5.31%2.18%1.69%1.17%2.40%3.31%2.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CPBYX and LCTRX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPBYX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to LCTRX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CPBYX dropped -20.73% vs LCTRX's -26.09%.

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CPBYX and LCTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer