CP9U.L vs. UB20.L
CP9U.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) and UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Amundi and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CP9U.L returned 0.78%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for UB20.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CP9U.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UB20.L.
Performance
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CP9U.L is traded in USD, while UB20.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB20.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CP9U.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than UB20.L's 8.62% return.
CP9U.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UB20.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 16.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 1.91% | 12.86% | -0.05% | 5.20% | -12.47% | 7.60% | 1.98% | 8.52% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 8.62% | 20.45% | 5.20% | 4.93% | -5.76% | 4.34% | 6.60% | 7.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CP9U.L and UB20.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2019 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, CP9U.L and UB20.L have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Real Estate
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Industrials
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Basic Materials
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Healthcare
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Consumer Cyclical
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Consumer Defensive
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Communication Services
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Technology
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Utilities
CP9U.L
UB20.L
Energy
CP9U.L
-
UB20.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank
CP9U.L
UB20.L
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CP9U.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.89 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | 6.03 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CP9U.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.31 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CP9U.L drawdown since its inception was -38.03%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9U.L and UB20.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CP9U.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.03% | -35.62% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.58% | -8.89% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -19.32% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.90% | -25.35% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -3.45% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -7.17% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.76% | +0.42% |
Volatility
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9U.L) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 4.27%. This indicates that CP9U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CP9U.L | UB20.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.27% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 10.68% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 13.57% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 18.88% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.12% | 20.06% | +7.06% |
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CP9U.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CP9U.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison
CP9U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9U.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.93% | 3.86% | 3.26% | 3.97% | 3.64% | 2.60% | 3.05% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 5.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CP9U.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB20.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB20.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CP9U.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CP9U.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.
Find the right allocation for CP9U.L and UB20.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer