UB20.L vs. IAPD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L).

UB20.L and IAPD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UB20.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. IAPD.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. It was launched on Jun 2, 2006. Both UB20.L and IAPD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	7.30%	12.00%	6.98%	-0.60%	5.80%	5.29%	2.35%	16.21%	-6.21%	14.50%
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS	11.82%	22.91%	9.51%	8.99%	11.40%	6.82%	-11.63%	11.98%	-8.55%	8.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB20.L achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than IAPD.L's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, UB20.L has underperformed IAPD.L with an annualized return of 8.51%, while IAPD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.

UB20.L

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -3.55%
• YTD: 7.30%
• 6M: 7.42%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 6.59%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

IAPD.L

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -2.68%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 6M: 20.14%
• 1Y: 40.36%
• 3Y*: 18.33%
• 5Y*: 12.69%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB20.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

IAPD.L

iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS

UB20.L

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Return for Risk

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB20.L

UB20.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
UB20.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
UB20.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
UB20.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
UB20.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UB20.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IAPD.L

IAPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IAPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IAPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 97
IAPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
IAPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UB20.L	IAPD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	3.07	-1.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.77	-1.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.60	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.71	-2.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	19.21	-11.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB20.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the IAPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB20.L and IAPD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UB20.L	IAPD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	3.07	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	1.02	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.63	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.56	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between UB20.L and IAPD.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison

UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than IAPD.L's 4.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.97%	3.86%	3.26%	3.97%	3.64%	2.60%	3.05%	4.03%	4.36%	3.43%	4.00%	5.16%
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS	4.95%	5.67%	6.72%	7.29%	8.34%	7.53%	4.77%	7.26%	7.70%	6.15%	5.60%	8.10%

Drawdowns

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB20.L drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -52.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB20.L and IAPD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UB20.L	IAPD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.04%	-52.66%	+22.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	-11.25%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.80%	-16.88%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.04%	-37.53%	+7.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.44%	-4.09%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.66%	-7.41%	+1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.14%	+0.62%

Volatility

UB20.L vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 4.07%. This indicates that UB20.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UB20.L	IAPD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	4.07%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	8.34%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.74%	13.14%	+1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.37%	12.44%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	15.55%	+2.74%