CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L
CP9G.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) and MWRD.L (Amundi Index MSCI World) are both exchange-traded funds - CP9G.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while MWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CP9G.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for MWRD.L.
Performance
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CP9G.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9G.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 2.12% | 5.89% | 0.85% | -0.56% | -1.42% | 6.76% | 0.48% | 13.35% | -5.17% | 5.99% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | -1.27% | 17.50% | -9.18% | 24.39% | 11.85% | 23.29% | -4.10% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CP9G.L and MWRD.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CP9G.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Financial Services
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Real Estate
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Industrials
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Basic Materials
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Healthcare
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Communication Services
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Technology
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Utilities
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
Energy
CP9G.L
-
MWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
CP9G.L
MWRD.L
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CP9G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CP9G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CP9G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | — | — |
Volatility
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CP9G.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | — | — |
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CP9G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CP9G.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CP9G.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CP9G.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CP9G.L.
CP9G.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. CP9G.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CP9G.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for CP9G.L and MWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer