COYY vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, COYY returned -56.54% vs -30.37% for PLTW. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

COYY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -38.54% return.

COYY

• 1D: -3.58%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: -19.84%
• YTD: -32.55%
• 1Y: -56.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -59.38%

PLTW

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: -21.93%
• YTD: -38.54%
• 1Y: -30.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	$328.65K	$310.41K	$590.67K
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.46M	$2.75M	$3.76M

COYY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	-32.55%	-40.04%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-38.54%	10.14%

Correlation

The correlation between COYY and PLTW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

COYY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COYY

COYY Risk / Return Rank: 0
COYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
COYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
COYY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
COYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
COYY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COYY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COYY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.77	-0.52	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-3.10	-0.42	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.63	0.95	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	-0.56	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	-1.02	-0.40

COYY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COYY Sharpe Ratio is -1.77, which is lower than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COYY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COYY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, which is greater than PLTW's maximum drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	COYY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.85%	-57.27%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.62%	-57.27%	-2.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.29%	-49.73%	-10.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.89%	-25.20%	-13.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.81%	31.48%	+12.33%

Volatility

COYY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) is 5.36%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 15.73%. This indicates that COYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COYY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	15.73%	-10.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.43%	48.95%	-30.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.16%	62.54%	-28.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.10%	73.53%	-39.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.10%	73.53%	-39.43%

COYY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

COYY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 472.52%, more than PLTW's 138.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	442.76%	132.14%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	138.40%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COYY and PLTW in my portfolio?

COYY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COYY or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (15.73%) compared to COYY (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COYY dropped -60.85% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, COYY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -30.37% vs -56.54% for COYY. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, COYY has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COYY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -30.37% return vs -56.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COYY or PLTW?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COYY or PLTW?

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 442.76%, compared with 138.40% for PLTW.

What is the main difference between COYY and PLTW?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.